Showing posts with label Peter Bourjos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Bourjos. Show all posts

Saturday, February 28, 2015

Trading for Cole Hamels

This post was in the works prior to the Tuesday's news that Adam Wainwright would be returning to St. Louis due to abdominal soreness. The Cardinals expect to receive the results of the examination later this week. I'm in favor of trading for Hamels even if Wainwright is completely healthy, but if Wainwright is hurt and will miss a significant amount of time, the importance of making a trade increases.

The Cardinals should seriously consider trading for Philadelphia’s Cole Hamels, even if it means including Carlos Martinez. The Cubs and Pirates are young teams that will improve each year. The Cubs in particular seemed poised to utilize their outstanding farm system and massive financial resources to get better in a hurry. On the flip side, the Cardinals core of Matt Holliday, Jhonny Peralta, and Yadier Molina will be a combined 100 years old this year, Jason Heyward is a free agent at the end of the season, and, outside of Stephen Piscotty, there is scant offensive talent on the horizon in the farm system. 

If all of the Cardinals starters are healthy, they have one of the best rotations in the league. However, there are significant questions surrounding the health of their top two projected starters, Adam Wainwright and Michael Wacha, and the depth beyond Marco Gonzales is thin. Additionally, John Lackey will be 36 and posted a 4.27 FIP and 4.30 ERA in his ten starts with the team in 2014. Baseball Prospectus' PECOTA projects him to be just above replacement level. This is fine for a fourth or fifth starter, but an injury to the top of the rotation pushes Lackey into the third starter role and he is not suited for it. 

What would a trade for Hamels look like? It has been reported that the Phillies have stated that any trade with the Cards will start with Carlos Martinez. I’d be ok with that. As detailed in my fifth starter post, Martinez oozes with upside, but he has some work to do to convert the raw talent into MLB production. While the Cards can afford to give him a chance to do this as a fifth starter, asking much more from him is a stretch. The issues he faces in his development are significant and I think it's highly likely that he becomes a valuable relief pitcher rather than a starter. 

The Cards top three prospects are Gonzales, outfielder Stephen Piscotty, and young right-handed pitcher Alex Reyes and they are all among the top 100 prospects in baseball. If the Cards are including Martinez, it’s unlikely that they would also include any of those players unless Philadelphia agreed to pay a significant portion of Hamels’ future salaries. Despite making his MLB debut last summer and contributing through the playoffs, Randal Grichuk is still eligible for inclusion on the prospect lists and ranked as high as fourth on Baseball America's. That's decidedly too high and he should be ranked somewhere in the 8-15 range. All of the scouting reports acknowledge he has above average power and is an excellent athlete capable of playing all three outfield positions. They also acknowledge that his approach needs to be refined. Even without an improved approach, his positives outweigh the negatives and he could provide at least average value in MLB this year. I touched more on Grichuk in my post on the bench. He is only 23 years old and would be an obvious second piece to any deal. It's possible the Phillies would prefer Peter Bourjos to Grichuk. While I like Bourjos' chances of bouncing back from his awful 2014 season, I think he and Grichuk have about the same trade value. I'd rather give up Grichuk, but would not hesitate to make a deal if the only difference was giving up Bourjos instead of Grichuk.

The third, and possible fourth pieces, will take the most work to agree on. If the trade includes Martinez and Grichuk, the Phillies will have already received two players capable of contributing to this year’s team, so they will likely seek one or two high-upside players. I have to think young outfielder Magneuris Sierra would be at the top of the Phillies’ list. 

Sierra was the Cards’ minor league player of the year last season after hitting .386/.434/.505 in the Gulf Coast League as an 18 year old. He made the back halves of Keith Law and Baseball America’s organizational top 10 prospects and garnered a 'Prospect on the Rise' mention from Baseball Prospectus. He is a no doubt future center fielder with good speed and outstanding bat control, leading some to project a plus bat. He has a small frame and only had 17 XBHs in his 223 PAs, so he does not project to ever hit for much power. He just completed his first season in the United States and played in the Gulf Coast League. He's very far away and his highly conservative rankings reflect this. In order to improve his value, he'll need to show that he can play at a high level in a full season league. He may get the chance to do this in 2015, but the Cards could hold him in Extended Spring Training until the New York-Penn League starts in the summer. As enticing as Sierra's upside is, it's more likely that he flames out in full season ball and this is the peak of his value. Trading him could come back to bite the Cards, but he is exactly the type of player the Phillies should be seeking to round out a Hamels trade. 

A package of Carlos Martinez, Randal Grichuk, and Magneuris Sierra should be enough to pry Hamels from the Phillies. The Cards have the financial resources to absorb the remaining money due on his contract and adding him to a rotation maximizes the team’s chances of winning before its window closes. Swapping Martinez for Hamels greatly improves the 2015 and 2016 rotations without hurting the team much beyond that. While there’s a chance that Grichuk develops into an everyday centerfielder, there remain significant questions regarding his aggressive approach and struggles against same-side pitching. Those could prevent him from reaching his ceiling. Finally, Sierra offers the highest upside of any prospect outside of the Cards’ top three prospects. None of their top prospects should be included in a trade unless the Phillies eat some of Hamels’ money. Sierra is a long way away and while he could develop quickly, it’s unlikely he’ll be contributing at the major league level until 2018 at the earliest. He’s exactly the type of player the Phillies should look to acquire a third piece in any Hamels trade as he’s not a top prospect, but if he’s able to repeat his GCL performance in a full season league, will see his prospect stock ascend.

This is really about the Cardinals current team composition, the competitive landscape, and their resources. They are an aging team with a shallow rotation. Adding a Cy-Young caliber arm, capable of making 30 starts a year, would do wonders to any team, but would bring stability to a rotation with a lot of questions. The Cards division is improving quickly and the Cards should seek to maximize their chances of winning while the younger teams are still improving. Finally, the Cardinals have stated they have significant financial flexibility. It's clear they will be major players in next year's free agent market and getting Hamels now somewhat limits the downside risk associated with free agents because he is only under contract for four years. Any pitcher signed in next year's free agency will likely require six or more years, so Hamels is a significantly less risky asset than would be available on the open market. 

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Spring Training Preview, Question 3: Centerfield?

In a series of seven posts, I'll be looking at some early spring issues facing the Cardinals. Today's question covers centerfield.

Barring injury, Jon Jay and Peter Bourjos will again see substantially all of the center field playing time in 2015. The two combined to start 156 of 162 games in 2014 with Jay starting 91 of those. Jay’s 91 starts were his fewest at the position since 2011 and his 468 plate appearances were also his fewest since 2010. On the surface, Jay had a nice season in 2014 as he bounced back from a .276 average in 2013 to hit .303, more in line with his career .295 average. He also improved his CF defense by posting positive UZR and DRS values compared to negatives in both in 2013.

However, there are plenty of reasons to be skeptical about both of these bounce-backs. First, as mentioned above, Jay did not get anywhere near a full season’s worth of playing time. Defensive statistics are more prone to sampling error than offensive statistics and Jay only made 136 plays in CF according to BIZ. BP’s FRAA stat had Jay as a negative for the second year in a row and trending in the wrong direction. The below plays are typical Jay plays. In both he comes very close to missing the ball but manages to make an outstanding play:




Second, Jay did not reach the majors until he was 25. Despite still being under team control for two seasons, he’ll turn 30 in March. He’s getting old and it’s quite possible that he has lost a step or two as shown by a variety of base-running metrics:


On Base
BP BRR
EBT
OOB
BT
SB+CS/SBO
2012
190
-0.5
48%
2
22
12.4%
2013
224
3.6
53%
5
18
6.1%
2014
179
-1.6
49%
9
11
4.5%

Over the past three seasons, Jay has been making more outs on the bases (OOB), taking fewer extra bases (EBT and BT), and running less (SB+CS/SBO). All told his overall base-running contributions were negative last year as compared to the year before, suggesting a player losing speed.

At best he’s an average defender and an average base-runner, but both of those are likely to be negative this season. At the plate he brings an empty average and not much else. He has a very slight platoon split, mostly caused by a .405 SLG vs right-handed pitchers and a .365 SLG vs left-handed pitchers and 25 of his 28 career home runs have come facing right-handed pitching. Overall his 2012-2014 ISO of 0.089 is the 41st lowest of hitters with 600+ PAs over that span. His OBP is boosted by an abnormally high amount of HBP as he has been plunked 49 times over the span, good for second most on that same list of hitters, while on a rate basis he’s the sixth most hitter over the past three seasons. There is some “skill” involved in HBP, but it also adds injury risk and should not be weighted as heavily as other ways a player can reach base in any assessment of a player's value.

The majority of Cardinals fans are too quick to write off Peter Bourjos. On an fWAR/PA basis, he outproduced Jay while bWAR/PA gave a slight advantage to Jay. Bourjos did this while hitting .231/.294/.348 in 294 PAs and only playing 649 innings in the field. In some ways Bourjos is the complete opposite of Jay. He is a very strong defender, a great baserunner, and while his batting line will be less impressive, the drop is not substantial because Bourjos hits for much more power. The knock on Bourjos’ 2014 season was his strikeouts. He struck out 26.5% of the time and that’s not far from his career average. Fans should expect him to continue to strike out and that’s NOT BAD.

Despite substantially fewer opportunities, Bourjos only had three fewer XHB than Jay. That being said, Bourjos is similar to Jay in that he also gets plunked at a high rate, does not hit for much more power, and does not have a platoon split. Bourjos has struggled to stay on the field over his career and his 264 PAs in 2014 were the second most of his five year career while his other three seasons were between 181 and 168. Although 2014 was the first time since 2010 he did not go on the DL, he underwent hip surgery in November and should be at full strength to start camp.

PECOTA projects Jay to hit .279/.343/.381 and Bourjos .246/.303/.385. I think Bourjos has more batting average and on-base upside while Jay’s line is basically what one could expect. At the very least they should see about equal playing time. Jay should never face a left-handed pitcher, unless Bourjos is unavailable, and given Bourjos’ defensive ability, I’d like to see him play the majority of the time vs right-handed pitching. The Cardinals say the job is Jay’s and they gave him a two year extension paying him $6.225 million in 2016, severely limiting his trade value if Bourjos emerges. Bourjos avoided arbitration and signed for $1.65 million and is also under team control through 2016. It seems unlikely both will be on the 2016 roster, but the team should be glad to have both this year. It's hard to imagine Bourjos playing worse than he did in 2014, while Jay is a prime candidate for regression.